From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 3, 2016
185 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D15–1625.

02-03-2016

Samson MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Samson Martin, Mayo, pro se. No brief required for appellee.


Samson Martin, Mayo, pro se.

No brief required for appellee.

ON APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant in part the appellant's motion for rehearing, but only to clarify that the defendant's appeal is from the denial of both his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We otherwise deny the appellant's motion for rehearing in all other respects, and thereby maintain our affirmance of the defendant's appeal on the merits. See Martinez v. State, 169 So.3d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Feb 3, 2016
185 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMSON MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 3, 2016

Citations

185 So. 3d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)