From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Mckenzie

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Oct 10, 1951
242 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. Civ. App. 1951)

Opinion

No. 12341.

October 10, 1951.

Appeal from the 73rd District Court, Bexar County, P. C. Sanders, J.

L. B. Cooper, Cotulla, for appellants.

House, Mercer House, San Antonio, for appellees.


This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege filed by J. W. Martin, Jr., and Ray Martin to be sued in La Salle County, Texas, the county of their residence.

Appellees attempt to assert venue in Bexar County under Subdivision 5 of Article 1995, Vernon's Civ.Stats. The suit was for a real estate commission on land located in La Salle County. The contract was in writing and is in evidence. It does not expressly provide that such real estate commission is payable in Bexar County, Texas, therefore venue can not be maintained in Bexar County under Subdivision 5 of Article 1995, supra. This subdivision was amended in 1935, and since that amendment our courts have held numerous times that before venue can be maintained in a county other than that of the defendant's residence under this provision of the venue statute, a written contract must be shown which provides that the obligation sued upon is performable in the county of suit, expressly naming the county or a definite place in the county. Ammann v. Daniel Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 220 S.W.2d 181; McKinney v. Moon, Tex.Civ.App., 173 S.W.2d 217; Cox v. Bunn, Tex.Civ.App., 160 S.W.2d 101; Smith v. Hall, 147 Tex. 634, 219 S.W.2d 441; Saigh v. Monteith, 147 Tex. 341, 215 S.W.2d 610; Laughlin v. Nordyke, Tex.Civ.App., 215 S.W.2d 424; Southwestern Peanut Growers Ass'n v. Kendrick, Tex.Civ.App., 183 S.W.2d 1019; Kendrick v. Mackey, Tex.Civ.App., 204 S.W.2d 394; Wrenn v. Brooks, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W. 299; Colman v. H. Dittlinger Roller Mills, Tex.Civ.App., 181 S.W.2d 604; Rio Grande Valley Citrus Exchange v. Leche Leche, Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 1015; Johnson v. Personius, Tex.Civ.App., 242 S.W.2d 471.

Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed and judgment here rendered transferring this cause to the District Court of La Salle County, in the manner provided by Rule 89, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Reversed and rendered.


Summaries of

Martin v. Mckenzie

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Oct 10, 1951
242 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. Civ. App. 1951)
Case details for

Martin v. Mckenzie

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN et al. v. McKENZIE et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Oct 10, 1951

Citations

242 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. Civ. App. 1951)

Citing Cases

Williams v. James

Under the statute, for plaintiff to sustain venue in Bexar County, the instrument relied upon must have…

Owens v. Sherrard Motor Co., Inc.

In our opinion the application for title and the issuance of the registration receipt form no part of the…