From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Nov 23, 2021
No. A-1-CA-39404 (N.M. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

A-1-CA-39404

11-23-2021

SCOTT MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEFO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

Campbell Law LLC John Brendan Campbell Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Montgomery & Andrews, P.A. Randy S. Bartell Kaleb W. Brooks Santa Fe, NM for Appellee


Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Francis J. Mathew, District Judge

Campbell Law LLC John Brendan Campbell Albuquerque, NM for Appellant

Montgomery & Andrews, P.A. Randy S. Bartell Kaleb W. Brooks Santa Fe, NM for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ZACHARY A. IVES, JUDGE

{¶1} Following a bench trial in favor of Defendant, Plaintiff appeals from the district court's orders denying Plaintiff's pretrial request for a continuance and post-trial request for a discovery sanction. We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary affirmance, which we have duly considered. Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition to our proposed disposition, and the time for doing so has now run.

{¶2} For the reasons outlined in our notice of proposed disposition, and in the absence of opposition from either party, we conclude that Defendant failed to demonstrate error on appeal. Farmers, Inc., v. Dal Mach. & Fabricating, Inc., 1990-NMSC-100, ¶ 8, 111 N.M. 6, 800 P.2d 1063 (stating that the burden is on the appellant to clearly demonstrate that the trial court erred); State v. Aragon, 1999-NMCA-060, ¶ 10, 127 N.M. 393, 981 P.2d 1211 (stating that there is a presumption of correctness in the rulings or decisions of the trial court, and the party claiming error bears the burden of showing such error). Accordingly, we affirm.

{¶3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge, SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge


Summaries of

Martin v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Nov 23, 2021
No. A-1-CA-39404 (N.M. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Martin v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEFO MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

No. A-1-CA-39404 (N.M. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2021)