From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Discover Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00290-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00290-O-BP

05-11-2017

LA TIA MARTIN a/k/a LATIA T. MONK-MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. DISCOVER BANK and LAW OFFICES OF ALLEN & WITHROW, Defendants.


FINDINGS , CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (ECF No. 6), filed May 3, 2017. After consideration of the pleadings and applicable law and because the Motion is unopposed, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that United States District Judge Reed O'Connor GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

Defendants Discover Bank and Law Offices of Allen & Withrow removed this case from Tarrant County Court at Law Number 3 on April 6, 2017. ECF No. 1. A hearing was held today during which counsel for Defendants represented to the Court that Defendants did not oppose the Motion to Remand. Accordingly, remand of this case to Tarrant County Court at Law Number 3 is appropriate and should be so ordered.

A copy of this findings, conclusions, and recommendation shall be served on all parties in the manner provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of this findings, conclusions, and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). In order to be specific, an objection must identify the specific finding or recommendation to which objection is made, state the basis for the objection, and specify the place in the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation where the disputed determination is found. An objection that merely incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing before the magistrate judge is not specific. Failure to file specific written objections will bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Signed May 11, 2017.

/s/_________

Hal R. Ray, Jr.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Martin v. Discover Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 11, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00290-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Martin v. Discover Bank

Case Details

Full title:LA TIA MARTIN a/k/a LATIA T. MONK-MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. DISCOVER BANK and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00290-O-BP (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)