From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 24, 2021
19-CV-1831 (GBD) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-1831 (GBD) (KNF)

06-24-2021

ADAM C. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 5, 2021, the plaintiffs counsel filed an affirmation stating that he “intends to file a supplemental motion to award attorneys [sic] fees pursuant to the decision in Sinkler v. Berryhill, 932 F.3d 83, 88-89 (2d Cir. 2019).” Docket Entry No. 55. Attached to counsel's affirmation is the Social Security Administration's April 5, 2021 “Authorization to Charge and Collect Fee” directed to Timothy S. McAdam of Mc Adam & Fallon, P.C in the amount of $9, 999.00, stating: “If the claimant thinks the fee is too high or you think the fee is too low, either party must write to us within 30 days from the date of this notice.”

On June 28, 2021, the plaintiff shall: (a) file a status letter informing the Court whether the plaintiff or his counsel challenged the Social Security Administration's April 5, 2021 authorization within the permitted time; and (b) propose a date for filing of a supplemental motion for attorney's fees.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 24, 2021
19-CV-1831 (GBD) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:ADAM C. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

19-CV-1831 (GBD) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)