Opinion
CV 93-0758; CA A85796
Submitted on record and briefs October 4, 1996.
Affirmed December 13, 1995. Petition for review denied April 9, 1996 ( 323 Or. 136)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Umatilla County, Jack F. Olsen, Judge.
Michael E. Rose filed the brief for appellant.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed.
Petitioner argues that he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he was indicted by a grand jury that was constitutionally inadequate, in that the grand jury was reduced in size to fewer than seven members without notice to him. Even assuming that the indictment was constitutionally defective, that defect, if any, does not constitute a basis for post-conviction relief. Goodwin v. State of Oregon, 125 Or. App. 359, 363, 866 P.2d 466 (1993), rev den 319 Or. 80 (1994).
Affirmed.