From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Limestone Redbay, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2017
Case No. 7:12-cv-02765-LSC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 7:12-cv-02765-LSC

08-09-2017

MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff v. LIMESTONE REDBAY, INC., Defendant


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 30, 2017, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation and therein allowed the parties fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No party has filed objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the court grant the motion to dismiss counterclaims and the motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff and dismiss this action with prejudice.

The court will enter a separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion.

DONE AND ORDERED ON AUGUST 9, 2017.

/s/_________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

160704


Summaries of

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Limestone Redbay, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2017
Case No. 7:12-cv-02765-LSC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Limestone Redbay, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff v. LIMESTONE REDBAY, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2017

Citations

Case No. 7:12-cv-02765-LSC (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2017)