From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshment v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 5, 2015
No. 66336 (Nev. App. Feb. 5, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66336

02-05-2015

WILLIAM ELLERY MARSHMENT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, entered pursuant to a guilty plea, of one count of conspiracy to commit grand larceny and one count of attempted grand larceny. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lidia Stiglich, Judge.

Appellant claims that the district court abused its discretion by relying on evidence not presented at appellant's sentencing hearing in determining restitution.

At his sentencing hearing, appellant objected to restitution in the amount of $13,000 as recommended because appellant could not understand why a spool of copper would be ruined once it was cut. The State offered to bring in an expert to testify regarding the value of the copper wire. The district court concluded that that was unnecessary because she was satisfied with the information in front of her, which included information regarding the value of the copper as established during the appellant's co-defendants' cases. The district court subsequently imposed restitution in the amount of $13,000, to be paid jointly and severally by appellant and his co-defendants. Appellant did not object to the district court's use of his co-defendants' information or otherwise further object to the imposition of restitution. Because appellant failed to object, this claim is subject to plain error. See Grey v. State, 124 Nev. 110, 123, 178 P.3d 154, 163 (2008) (observing that unpreserved errors at sentencing are reviewed for plain error). Appellant has failed to demonstrate plain error because he failed to demonstrate that the district court relied on unreliable or inaccurate information when calculating restitution. See Saletta v. State, 127 Nev. ___, ___, 254 P.3d 111, 114 (2011); see also Martinez v. State, 115 Nev. 9, 13, 974 P.2d 133, 135 (1999); Major v. State, 130 Nev. ___, ___, 333 P.3d 235, 238 (2014). Therefore, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge

Washoe County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Marshment v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 5, 2015
No. 66336 (Nev. App. Feb. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Marshment v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ELLERY MARSHMENT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

Citations

No. 66336 (Nev. App. Feb. 5, 2015)