From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 18, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio May. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-170

05-18-2015

RODNEY MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Madison Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Warden's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11) is DENIED. May 18, 2015.

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marshall v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
May 18, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio May. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Marshall v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Madison Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: May 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio May. 18, 2015)