From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 11, 2012
91 So. 3d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–2669.

2012-07-11

Larry MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2004CF003686AXX. Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Jennifer Workman Jesness, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2004CF003686AXX.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Jennifer Workman Jesness, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Larry Marshall seeks review of an order that dismissed his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. The judge concluded that he lacked jurisdiction to entertain the postconviction motion, in light of Marshall's pending appeal of a prior rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand in light of our recent decisions in Lubin v. State, 87 So.3d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), and Jackman v. State, 88 So.3d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). As outlined in Lubin, through Jackman we adopted the rationale of Bryant v. State, ––– So.3d ––––, 2012 WL 28713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), and held that a trial court has authority to consider or to defer ruling and stay a subsequently filed postconviction motion that raises unrelated issues, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal of an order on a previously filed postconviction motion. As in Jackman, we express no opinion on the merits of Marshall's motion.

Reversed and remanded.

MAY, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 11, 2012
91 So. 3d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

91 So. 3d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Hamze v. State

The trial court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion in light of appellant's pending…