From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1999
731 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-2743

Opinion filed May 5, 1999. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1999

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge, L.T. No. 97-2231.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and John E. Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Barbara A. Zappi (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


A new trial is required in this case because of a manifest, plainly harmful violation, over the preserved objections of defense counsel, of the principles stated in Brown v. State, 719 So.2d 882 (Fla. 1998) and Rios v. State, 730 So.2d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 97-2428, opinion filed, April 14, 1999) [24 FLW D937], both of which were decided after the trial. See also State v. Emmund, 698 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The other points raised by the appellant have no merit.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1999
731 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP MARSHALL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 5, 1999

Citations

731 So. 2d 165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Marshall v. State

Defendant-appellant Marshall was initially sentenced to life imprisonment but on appeal a new trial was…