From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 28, 2014
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-0426 (S.D. Ohio May. 28, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-0426

05-28-2014

RODNEY J. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. RONDA RICHARD, Respondent.


JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL


OPINION AND ORDER

On May 9, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, western Division at Dayton.

Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action hereby is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, western Division at Dayton.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marshall v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 28, 2014
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-0426 (S.D. Ohio May. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Marshall v. Richard

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY J. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. RONDA RICHARD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 28, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-0426 (S.D. Ohio May. 28, 2014)