From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1997
695 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-520

Opinion filed July 9, 1997.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Mandamus.

Aaron K. Marsh, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.


Based on the state's proper confession of error, we find that the court erred in denying Marsh's motion for return of property seized at the time of arrest. The court improperly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion. See Estevez v. State, 386 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Butler v. State, 613 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA), cause dismissed 621 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1993). "Since mandamus is the proper procedure to test the correctness of the trial court's determination that it was without jurisdiction," we treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and grant the petition. Estevez, 386 So.2d at 45.

Mandamus granted.


Summaries of

Marsh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 9, 1997
695 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Marsh v. State

Case Details

Full title:AARON K. MARSH, PETITIONER, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 9, 1997

Citations

695 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)