From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrero v. Wolffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1977
60 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

December 12, 1977


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 21, 1976, as granted defendant's motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the wrongful death cause of action. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the cause of action for wrongful death is reinstated. Contrary to Special Term's finding, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the portion of the building occupied by Mrs. Wolffe had a separate outside entrance used for ingress and egress. The service upon her at the main entrance of the residence complied with the requirements of CPLR 308 (subd 2) (cf. du Pont, Glore Forgan Co. v Chen, 41 N.Y.2d 794). Rabin, J.P., Shapiro, Suozzi and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marrero v. Wolffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1977
60 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Marrero v. Wolffe

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICHO MARRERO, as Administrator of the Estate of JEAN L. MARRERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1977

Citations

60 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Roldan v. Thorpe

Moreover, two modes of access to the defendant's basement apartment, i.e., through doors on the side and rear…

Codd v. Barbaro

In DuPont, Glore Forgan Co. v Chen ( 41 N.Y.2d 794, 797) service under CPLR 308 (subd 2) was permitted upon…