From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MARRERO v. KRA CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-2516-JF (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-2516-JF.

February 23, 2010


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiffs have sued their employer, KRA Corporation, and its president and chief executive officer, Knowlton R. Atterbeary, alleging that they were denied overtime pay in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ("FLSA") and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, 43 P.S. § 333.101 et seq. ("MWA"). Plaintiffs seek to have the lawsuit conditionally certified as a collective action. I will grant the motion.

The FLSA authorizes collective actions where the complaining employees are "similarly situated" and they consent in writing to participate in the lawsuit. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). At this preliminary stage of the proceedings, I need only determine whether the proposed class of plaintiffs is "similarly situated."Parker v. Nutrisystem, Inc., No. 08-1508, 2008 WL 4399023, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 2008). As my colleague Chief Judge Bartle has noted, the standard is "extremely lenient" and the Court does not assess the merits of the claim at this time.

Plaintiffs have met this standard to certify conditionally a class of "Career Agents" employed by KRA Corporation during any week in the past three years. Several former such employees have submitted declarations asserting that they, and others, often worked more than 40 hours in a week without receiving overtime compensation, even though they spent the majority of their time performing non-executive, non-administrative, and non-professional tasks.

Plaintiffs have also submitted a standardized job description for the "Career Agents" employed at the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Tidewater, Virginia locations, which shows that the position is the same in more than one location.

After discovery is completed, plaintiffs will have to meet a higher level of proof, and certification may be reconsidered at that time.

An order will be entered.


Summaries of

MARRERO v. KRA CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-2516-JF (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

MARRERO v. KRA CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:AQUI'SHA MARRERO, et al. v. KRA CORPORATION and KNOWLTON R. ATTERBEARY

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-2516-JF (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Justison v. McDonald's Corp.

Thus, the FLSA permits collective action where (1) the employees are "similarly situated," and (2) they…