From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrama v. Citizens Bank

U.S.
Oct 10, 2006
549 U.S. 951 (2006)

Summary

commenting on the “broad authority granted to bankruptcy judges to take any action that is necessary or appropriate to ‘prevent an abuse of process' ...”

Summary of this case from In re Salpietro

Opinion

No. 05-996.

October 10, 2006.


Miscellaneous Orders

C.A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, 547 U. S. 1191.] Motion of National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument denied. Motion of respondents for divided argument denied. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.


Summaries of

Marrama v. Citizens Bank

U.S.
Oct 10, 2006
549 U.S. 951 (2006)

commenting on the “broad authority granted to bankruptcy judges to take any action that is necessary or appropriate to ‘prevent an abuse of process' ...”

Summary of this case from In re Salpietro
Case details for

Marrama v. Citizens Bank

Case Details

Full title:MARRAMA v. CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 2006

Citations

549 U.S. 951 (2006)
127 S. Ct. 427

Citing Cases

Worth v. Frost (In re Worth)

“must be guided by a respect for the finality of the confirmation process balanced by the powers bestowed on…

In re Salpietro

This Court believes that the broad discretion allowed by section 1329(a) must be guided by a respect for the…