From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marr v. Collin Cnty. Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 11, 2021
Civil Action 4:20-cv-273-RAS-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-cv-273-RAS-KPJ

09-11-2021

RICHARD MARR, Plaintiff, v. COLLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 19 and 23, 2021, the reports of the Magistrate Judge (Dkts. #64, #66) were entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Collin County Detention Center, Lieutenant Ryan Griggs, Lieutenant Tami McCullough, Deputy FNU Franklin, Deputy FNU Peters, Deputy FNU Dockery, Deputy FNU Wagner, and Deputy FNU Anderson's (collectively, the “Moving Defendants”) Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. #38, #40) should be granted for failure to state a claim.

Additionally, on August 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a third report (Dkt. #70), which recommended that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Deputy Kyle Babcock, Deputy FNU Cuba, Deputy FNU Cramwell, and “Kitchen/Chaplain” (collectively, the “Non-Moving Defendants”) be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

Having received the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's reports as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Moving Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. #38, 40) are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims against the Moving Defendants are DISMISSED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims against the Non-Moving Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marr v. Collin Cnty. Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Sep 11, 2021
Civil Action 4:20-cv-273-RAS-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Marr v. Collin Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD MARR, Plaintiff, v. COLLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Sep 11, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-cv-273-RAS-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2021)

Citing Cases

Kibbey v. Collin Cnty. Det. Facility

This Court has, in turn, applied this principle to CCDF in numerous prior cases, finding CCDF subject to…

Eckiss v. Skinner

(collecting cases) (“As this Court has repeatedly held, the [Collin County] Detention Center is a non-jural…