Summary
holding third party coverage under void policy is restricted to minimum limits required by compulsory insurance law requirements
Summary of this case from Palisades Safety Ins. v. BastienOpinion
Argued April 30, 1996 —
Decided June 11, 1996.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Eric S. Plaum argued the cause for appellant.
Laurie Harrold Rozzo argued the cause for respondent ( Slimm Goldberg, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J. Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.