From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlowe v. Redi-National Pest Eliminators, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 20, 1991
806 P.2d 1181 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

89C 11083; CA A63716

Argued and submitted October 26, 1990

Reversed and remanded March 20, 1991

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County, Richard D. Barber, Judge.

Dale L. Crandall, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

John F. Adlard, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded.


Plaintiff brought this action to rescind a franchise agreement. The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, on the basis of this provision in the contract:

"Any action brought to enforce any right under this Agreement shall be brought in the Federal District or Superior Court in King County, Washington."

Assuming that that provision applies to this case, and no party challenges that, it would not preclude the Oregon court from acquiring personal jurisdiction over defendant, which was properly served with the summons and complaint. Defendant conceded at oral argument that the court had personal jurisdiction over it. The court erred in granting defendant's motion to dismiss on that ground.

Plaintiff is not seeking "to enforce any right under [the] agreement"; he seeks to rescind it.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Marlowe v. Redi-National Pest Eliminators, Inc.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 20, 1991
806 P.2d 1181 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Marlowe v. Redi-National Pest Eliminators, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Tom L. MARLOWE, Appellant, v. REDI-NATIONAL PEST ELIMINATORS, INC.…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 20, 1991

Citations

806 P.2d 1181 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
806 P.2d 1181