From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marlin v. Chase Cardmember Services

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 3, 2009
CASE NO. 1:09 CV 00192 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09 CV 00192 AWI DLB.

March 3, 2009

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN BENTLEY, GEORGE G. WEICKHARDT (SBN 58586), WENDY C. KROG (SBN 257010), San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., erroneously sued herein as CHASE CARDMEMBER SERVICES.


ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. having filed an Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

That defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. shall have to and including April 3, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Marlin v. Chase Cardmember Services

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 3, 2009
CASE NO. 1:09 CV 00192 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Marlin v. Chase Cardmember Services

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND M. MARLIN, Plaintiff, v. CHASE CARDMEMBER SERVICES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09 CV 00192 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Randall v. Nelson Kennard; LVNV Funding, L.L.C.

"[A]lthough the Ninth Circuit has not specifically decided whether a counterclaim for the underlying debt in…

Martin v. Law Offices of John F. Edwards

"Although the Ninth Circuit has not specifically decided whether a counterclaim for the underlying debt in an…