From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markley et al. v. I. E. Schilling Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 1, 1926
91 Fla. 1031 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

1926.


On Petition for Rehearing.


The action against the defendants below was not as stockholders of a corporation who under the statute were liable as partners because a requirement of the law was not complied with, and the defendants did not by plea aver their status as being that of stockholders. There was consequently no occasion for the court to discuss whether there was a dissolution of a corporation. The evidence referred to the corporation and that was adverted to only so far as it showed the existence, continuance and termination of a relation in the nature of a partnership among the defendants who were sued as copartners and not as stockholders with a statutory partnership liability.

Rehearing denied.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J. concur.

BROWN, C. J., AND ELLIS, J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

Markley et al. v. I. E. Schilling Co.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 1, 1926
91 Fla. 1031 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Markley et al. v. I. E. Schilling Co.

Case Details

Full title:J. M. MARKLEY, HUGH ANDERSON, R. B. LEONARD AND J. V. RILEY, CO-PARTNERS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jan 1, 1926

Citations

91 Fla. 1031 (Fla. 1926)