From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markey v. Supreme Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1902
70 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

March Term, 1902.

Charles Haldane, for the appellant.

Edwin C. Low, for the respondent.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., INGRAHAM, McLAUGHLIN, HATCH and LAUGHLIN, JJ.


If it be true, as urged by the appellant, that the defendant had no authority, under its constitution, to make the certificate issued upon the life of Joseph P. Markey payable to the brother, Edward J. Markey, it does not follow that the plaintiff can, by reason of that fact, recover the amount stated in the certificate. If the defendant's act in issuing the certificate was ultra vires the plaintiff cannot take advantage of it, inasmuch as she has no certificate at all, and comes into court without the basis of any claim whatever. ( Luhrs v. Supreme Lodge Knights Ladies of Honor, 27 N.Y. St. Repr. 88.) But the precise question here presented was determined adversely to the plaintiff's contention in Maguire v. Maguire ( 59 App. Div. 143), and, therefore, upon that authority, this judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Markey v. Supreme Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1902
70 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Markey v. Supreme Council

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE MARKEY, as Administratrix, etc., of JOSEPH P. MARKEY, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1902

Citations

70 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
74 N.Y.S. 1069

Citing Cases

Coulson v. Flynn

If then the corporation could not maintain a defense to the claim of the defendant as the designated…

Coulson v. Flynn

It has been frequently held in the lower courts that if the defendant association's act in issuing the…