From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markey v. Jae Sam Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 9, 1969
224 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-205.

July 9, 1969.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, I.C. Spoto, J.

James M. McEwen, of Gibbons, Tucker, McEwen, Smith Cofer, Tampa, for William Thomas Markey.

Herboth S. Ryder, of Albritton, Sessums Ryder, Tampa, for Dock Marine Construction, Inc.

Brendan P. O'Sullivan, of Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, for respondent.


The statute of limitations having run on offenses arising out of the accident in which the plaintiff was injured, the Circuit Judge properly declined to enter an order protecting Markey against testifying on deposition on the ground that he might incriminate himself. See Mead v. State, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 373.

Certiorari denied.

LILES, A.C.J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Markey v. Jae Sam Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 9, 1969
224 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Markey v. Jae Sam Lee

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM THOMAS MARKEY AND DOCK MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 9, 1969

Citations

224 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

MacFarland v. State

Thus, Wright could not assert his privilege against self-incrimination after the statute of limitations ran…

Barrow v. State

Thus, Wright could not assert his privilege against self-incrimination after the statute of limitations ran…