From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marker v. Mustang Special Util. Dist.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Nov 27, 2019
No. 02-19-00198-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2019)

Opinion

No. 02-19-00198-CV

11-27-2019

C. PERRY MARKER D/B/A TEXAS DIRT CONTRACTORS, Appellant v. MUSTANG SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT AND CITY OAK POINT, Appellees


On Appeal from the 462nd District Court Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. 18-11314-16 Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Gabriel, J.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 30, 2019, we notified appellant that its brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and the need for an extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.

Per Curiam Delivered: November 27, 2019


Summaries of

Marker v. Mustang Special Util. Dist.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Nov 27, 2019
No. 02-19-00198-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Marker v. Mustang Special Util. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:C. PERRY MARKER D/B/A TEXAS DIRT CONTRACTORS, Appellant v. MUSTANG SPECIAL…

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 27, 2019

Citations

No. 02-19-00198-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2019)