From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00006-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00006-PB

09-21-2012

MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ZIPHER LTD. and VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs


(Consolidated Action)


Judge: Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro


PROPOSED ORDER

On this day came to be considered the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss All Remaining Claims Without Prejudice.

After considering the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, in order to put the case in condition for appeal, the following remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice:

• Markem's claim of noninfringement regarding the '572 patent (No. 1:07-cv-6-PB, Dkt. No. 39 (Markem's Amended Complaint));
• Markem's claims of noninfringement regarding the '094, '268, '917, and '605 patents (No. 1:10-cv-112-PB, Dkt. No. 33 (Markem's Third Amended Complaint)); and
• Markem's claims of unenforceability regarding the '094, '268, '917, and '605 patents (No. 1:10-cv-112-PB, Dkt. No. 33 (Markem's Third Amended Complaint)).

The clerk is directed to enter a new final judgment on all claims and close the case.

SO ORDERED.

______________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sep 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00006-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ZIPHER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Sep 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-00006-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 21, 2012)