From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mark v. Hethcote

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 19, 2008
245 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89739.

February 19, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, James R. Hartenbach.

Howard A. Wittner, David von Gontard, Matthew Kallial, Wittner, Spewak, Maylack Spooner, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Jody H. Wolff, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.



ORDER


Former wife appeals from a judgment of the trial court modifying maintenance. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mark v. Hethcote

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 19, 2008
245 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Mark v. Hethcote

Case Details

Full title:In re MARRIAGE OF Mark E. HETHCOTE and Denise K. HETHCOTE. Mark E…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

245 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)