From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 29, 1994
635 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2680.

April 29, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Belvin Perry, Jr., J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Carlos E. Marino complains and we agree that the trial court imposed an improper sentence after a violation of probation. The trial court stated:

This sentence is to run consecutive to any other sentence that you are serving now or may be serving in the future. It is the intent of this sentence that no court shall run their sentence concurrent with this sentence when it shall be consecutive.

The requirement that the sentence imposed is to be served consecutively to any future sentence is improper and the state concedes that issue. Teffeteller v. State, 396 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

The requirement that Marino's sentence be served consecutively to any future sentence is stricken, but his sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SENTENCE STRICKEN IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.

PETERSON, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 29, 1994
635 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Marino v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS E. MARINO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 29, 1994

Citations

635 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Ward v. State

For the foregoing reasons, we remand this matter to the trial court to enter an appropriate judgment pursuant…

Jarrett v. State

Accordingly, we conclude the contempt proceedings against Jarrett should have been conducted pursuant to rule…