Summary
affirming the revocation of probation and sentence in the Anders appeal but remanding for entry of a corrected order accurately reflecting the conditions of probation the appellant admitted to violating
Summary of this case from Ephron v. StateOpinion
No. 2D13–4943.
10-10-2014
Harrison Bradley MARGOLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion
DAVIS, Chief Judge.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Harrison Bradley Margolis challenges the revocation of his probation and the resulting sentence for his underlying conviction of aggravated child abuse. He admitted to the violations. We affirm the revocation and sentence without further comment. We write only to note that the order of revocation contains a scrivener's error in that it indicates that Margolis admitted to violating conditions “2, 7, [and] 50” of his probation. According to the record on appeal, Margolis was alleged to have violated and admitted to violations of conditions 2, 7, and 35 of his probation. We therefore remand for the limited purpose of the entry of a corrected order of revocation to accurately reflect the conditions of probation Margolis admitted to violating. See Green v. State, 956 So.2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
Affirmed but remanded.
KHOUZAM and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.