Opinion
Case No. CV 11-08715 DDP (MANx)
12-22-2011
VAHE MARGARYAN, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION LLC, Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
[Docket No. 11]
Presently before the court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case. (Dkt. No. 11). Because Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, the court GRANTS the motion.
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that "[t]he failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion." C.D. caL. L.R. 7-12.
The hearing on Defendant's motion was set for December 23, 2011. Plaintiff's opposition was therefore due by December 2, 2011. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiff's failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge