From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mares v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 17, 2022
5:22-cv-01099-SP (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-cv-01099-SP

10-17-2022

GUSTAVO MARES v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al.


Present: The Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Effect Service and Prosecute

On July 1, 2022, plaintiff filed a complaint in this matter. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), plaintiff was required to serve each defendant with the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint's filing, that is, no later than September 29, 2022. That date has now passed, but plaintiff has not filed any proof of such service with the court, nor is there any other indication before the court that the complaint has been served on any defendant.

Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing by October 31, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and serve defendants within the required time period. Plaintiff may discharge this Order to Show Cause by filing, not later than October 31, 2022, proof of service of the summons and complaint.

The court warns plaintiff that failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause by October 31, 2022, or further failure to prosecute this action in accordance with court orders, may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Mares v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 17, 2022
5:22-cv-01099-SP (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Mares v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVO MARES v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 17, 2022

Citations

5:22-cv-01099-SP (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022)