From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marczak v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December, 1932.


Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. On the facts presented by this record we are of opinion that it cannot be held that the chamberlain acted unreasonably, improperly or negligently in making the investment herein. ( Chesterman v. Eyland, 81 N.Y. 398.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. [ 147 Misc. 399. ]


Summaries of

Marczak v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Marczak v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY MARCZAK, by JOHN MARCZAK, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Matter of Flint

We have held that it is not negligent for a fiduciary to invest in a security maturing beyond the date when…