Opinion
5:21-cv-00489-JWH-SPx
06-14-2022
MARITIME DOCUMENTATION CENTER CORP., a Montana corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to the “Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 37]” entered substantially contemporaneously herewith, and in accordance with Rules 56 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the abovecaptioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 & 2202, and 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B).
2. The operative pleading of Plaintiff Maritime Documentation Center Corp. (“Maritime”) is its “Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief” [ECF No. 1] (the “Complaint”). In its Complaint, Maritime asserts one claim for declaratory relief against Defendant United States Coast Guard (the “Coast Guard”) for non-compliance with Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) obligations.
3. On Maritime's sole claim for declaratory relief for non-compliance with FOIA obligations, the Coast Guard shall have JUDGMENT in its favor and against Maritime. Maritime shall take nothing by way of its Complaint.
4. Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.