From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuella v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1316 (E.D. Pa. May. 27, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1316.

May 27, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27 day of MAY, 2009, upon independent review of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In the Alternative, Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 8), Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Doc. 9), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 8) is DENIED but Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Doc. 8) is GRANTED;

3. The final decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits to Plaintiff is VACATED; and

4. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report.


Summaries of

Manuella v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1316 (E.D. Pa. May. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Manuella v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MARIA MANUELLA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 27, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1316 (E.D. Pa. May. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Diggs v. Colvin

I find that the ALJ's failure to consider whether Plaintiff could afford medical treatment and medication due…

Alexander v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

This requirement would only apply here if the ALJ concludes upon remand that the elbow injury rendered…