From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuel v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lake Charles Division
Jul 3, 1996
932 F. Supp. 784 (W.D. La. 1996)

Summary

holding that the “thirty day period in which defendant can remove commences on defendant's actual receipt of a copy of the pleading”

Summary of this case from Holden v. Serco Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 96-1186.

July 3, 1996.

Larry A. Roach, Lake Charles, LA, for plaintiff.

Lauren A. Welch, New Orleans, LA, for defendant.


MEMORANDUM RULING


Before the court is plaintiff's motion to remand (doc. # 5). Plaintiff alleges that removal was not timely effected.

"The notice of removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within thirty days after the receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based, . . ." 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) (emphasis added).

Here, plaintiff filed suit in state court on March 27, 1996. Defendant was served through the Louisiana Secretary of State on April 9, 1996. The Notice of Removal was filed on May 10, 1996. Defendant received a copy of plaintiff's initial pleading sometime between April 10, 1996 and May 10, 1996. Service upon the Secretary of State does not commence the thirty day removal period. Skinner v. Old Southern Life Ins. Co., 572 F. Supp. 811, 812-13 (W.D.La. 1983). Instead, the thirty day removal period begins when the named defendant actually receives a copy of the initial pleading. Id.

In its amended Notice of Removal, defendant, Unum Life Insurance Company, states that it did not receive a copy of the petition until May 16, 1996. This is in error. A copy of the state court petition was filed with the notice of removal, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). Moreover, on April 10, the Secretary of State forwarded the citation to Unum, via mail.

As stated previously, sometime between April 10, and May 10, 1996, Unum Life Insurance Company received a copy of the state court petition. The exact date is immaterial; under any scenario, removal was effected within thirty days, and was timely.

In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs is likewise DENIED.


Summaries of

Manuel v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lake Charles Division
Jul 3, 1996
932 F. Supp. 784 (W.D. La. 1996)

holding that the “thirty day period in which defendant can remove commences on defendant's actual receipt of a copy of the pleading”

Summary of this case from Holden v. Serco Inc.

holding that the "thirty day period in which defendant can remove commences on defendant's actual receipt of a copy of the pleading"

Summary of this case from Hibernia Community Dev. v. U.S.E. Community Serv.

holding that the "thirty day period in which defendant can remove commences on defendant's actual receipt of a copy of the pleading"

Summary of this case from Hibernia Community Development v. U.S.E. Comm. Ser. Group
Case details for

Manuel v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

Case Details

Full title:Barnell MANUEL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lake Charles Division

Date published: Jul 3, 1996

Citations

932 F. Supp. 784 (W.D. La. 1996)

Citing Cases

Bodden v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.

Several district courts have addressed factual situations similar to those present in the instant case. The…

Holden v. Serco Inc.

See, e.g., First Choice Surgery Ctr. of Baton Rouge, LLC v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. 12-0065, 2012…