From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manuel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77165

Filed: October 3, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE DENNIS SCHAUMANN

S. Paige Canfield, Suite 350, 1221 Locust, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. and John Munson Morris, III, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ


ORDER

Zahmeen Manuel (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Manuel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Oct 3, 2000
28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Manuel v. State

Case Details

Full title:ZAHMEEN MANUEL, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Oct 3, 2000

Citations

28 S.W.3d 459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)