From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manson v. Dixon

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
May 5, 2022
4:20cv333-TKW-MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2022)

Opinion

4:20cv333-TKW-MAF

05-05-2022

TALLAHASS DAVID MANSON, Petitioner, v. RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.


ORDER

T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19). No objections were filed.

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's determination that Petitioner's §2254 habeas petition is due to be denied because the record establishes that (1) the state court's disposition of the exhausted claims was not based on an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law or an unreasonable determination of the facts, and (2) the unexhausted claims are procedurally barred (and meritless in any event). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner's §2254 habeas petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Manson v. Dixon

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
May 5, 2022
4:20cv333-TKW-MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Manson v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:TALLAHASS DAVID MANSON, Petitioner, v. RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: May 5, 2022

Citations

4:20cv333-TKW-MAF (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2022)