Mansolino v. Haberman

Full title: MARGERY D. MANSOLINO et al., Appellants, v. JACOB HABERMAN, Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 22, 1997

239 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

658 N.Y.S.2d 843

Opinion

May 22, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.),

The complaint was properly dismissed, since plaintiffs did not plead that they offered to bear the expense of building modifications they requested (Executive Law § 296[1]), admitted that the originally alleged discriminatory practices and policies (Executive Law § 296[2]) were corrected, and failed to adduce evidence of any other discriminatory practices and policies.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.