Opinion
May 22, 1997
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.),
The complaint was properly dismissed, since plaintiffs did not plead that they offered to bear the expense of building modifications they requested (Executive Law § 296[1]), admitted that the originally alleged discriminatory practices and policies (Executive Law § 296[2]) were corrected, and failed to adduce evidence of any other discriminatory practices and policies.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.