From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 22, 1965
176 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

No. 64-1073.

June 22, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harold B. Spaet, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.


The appellant, by this appeal, seeks review of an adverse order on his petition filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. He urges, as the basis of his collateral attack on his conviction, that he was induced to plead guilty by promises made to him by his privately employed counsel.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in denying relief. The State is not responsible for promises or inducements made by one's own privately obtained attorney, see and compare: Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 775.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Manning v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 22, 1965
176 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Manning v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RALPH MANNING, A/K/A ROBERT RALPH MANNING, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 22, 1965

Citations

176 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Wilder v. State

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having…

Manning v. State

The fact that a plea of guilty is entered because of the defense attorney's promise of a lighter sentence…