From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Masters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-00896-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-00896-KJD-CWH

02-19-2013

KENNETH MANNING, Plaintiff, v. FRANK MASTERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motions (#27/28/29/32). All the motions were filed after the Court granted (#24) Defendants' motion to dismiss for failing to exhaust administrative grievances. The motions, amongst other requests, appear to ask the court for an extension of time alleging that his legal paperwork was tampered with. However, the relief Plaintiff seeks would not address the underlying issue, whether he fully exhausted his administrative remedies on his underlying claim that he was forced to take medication as retaliation for exercising his first amendment right to question Defendants' gender and personal hygiene. Accordingly, the motions are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Manning v. Masters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 19, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-00896-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Manning v. Masters

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH MANNING, Plaintiff, v. FRANK MASTERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-00896-KJD-CWH (D. Nev. Feb. 19, 2013)