From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 29, 2009
Case Number: 1:07cv951 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:07cv951.

January 29, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on December 22, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12). Subsequently, the defendant filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) and plaintiff filed a response to the objections (Doc. 14).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner, that Plaintiff was not entitled to supplemental security income or disability insurance benefits beginning on September 30, 2003, is found NOT SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, and is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED to the ALJ for an immediate award of benefits and as no further matters remain pending for the Court's review this case is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 29, 2009
Case Number: 1:07cv951 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:GARY A. MANNING, Plaintiff(s), v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2009

Citations

Case Number: 1:07cv951 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Tate v. Astrue

] Thus, the ALJ's assumption that plaintiff "earned" the full amount of monies she received from IHSS in 2008…

Sandlin v. Astrue

Moreover, I find cases reaching a different conclusion to be factually distinguishable. See, e.g. Manning v.…