Opinion
No. 482 CA 21-01531
08-04-2022
MANNING SQUIRES HENNIG CO., INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. HIGHLAND MASONRY AND RESTORATION, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) JOSEPH MARINO, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MANNING SQUIRES HENNIG CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (SAMANTHA V. CATONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF. HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MARC A. SCHULZ OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (EDWARD L. SMITH, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (SAMANTHA V. CATONE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MARC A. SCHULZ OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (EDWARD L. SMITH, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered October 21, 2021. The order denied the motions of defendant-third-party plaintiff and third-party defendant for leave to renew their opposition to that part of plaintiff's prior motion seeking partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Marino v Manning Squires Hennig Co., Inc. ([appeal No. 1] __ A.D.3d __ [Aug. 4, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).