From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 15, 2011
62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

remanding to correct a written judgment erroneously indicating that Mann was convicted of robbery with a firearm, rather than robbery with a weapon

Summary of this case from Sutton v. State

Opinion

No. 2D10-2920.

June 15, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Mark A. Steinbeck, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Mark C. Katzef, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm George Mann's conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.

DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 15, 2011
62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

remanding to correct a written judgment erroneously indicating that Mann was convicted of robbery with a firearm, rather than robbery with a weapon

Summary of this case from Sutton v. State
Case details for

Mann v. State

Case Details

Full title:George MANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 15, 2011

Citations

62 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Sutton v. State

As a result, the judgment reflects that Sutton was convicted of the new counts three and four, which list the…

McKnight v. State

Therefore, we remand for correction of the scrivener's error on the written judgment on count two to…