From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Schimmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

July, 1934.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. In our opinion the finding of the trial justice that the flower pot was securely and firmly fastened to the cement slab upon which it rested is contrary to the evidence. We are also of the opinion that even if the flower pot was caused to fall by the act of the infant plaintiff's sister, still the plaintiffs could recover against the defendant if defendant's negligence in failing to obey the ordinance in question contributed to the injury and was a direct and proximate cause thereof. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

See New York Code of Ordinances, chap. 23, art. 18, § 250.


Summaries of

Mann v. Schimmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Mann v. Schimmel

Case Details

Full title:SOL MANN, by ISAAC MANN, His Guardian ad Litem, and Another, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)