From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Sanders

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Apr 6, 1961
29 Ill. App. 2d 291 (Ill. App. Ct. 1961)

Summary

In Mann v. Sanders, 29 Ill. App.2d 291, (the then Third District) it was held that a motion to direct a verdict presents only a legal question and is subject to review without a motion for a new trial.

Summary of this case from Keen v. Davis

Opinion

Gen. No. 10,325. (Abstract of Decision.)

February 21, 1961. Rehearing denied April 6, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. RODNEY A. SCOTT, Judge, presiding. Affirmed.

Kenneth A. Green, of Mattoon, for appellant;

Garman, Greanias Owen, of Decatur, for appellee.


Not to be published in full.


Summaries of

Mann v. Sanders

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Apr 6, 1961
29 Ill. App. 2d 291 (Ill. App. Ct. 1961)

In Mann v. Sanders, 29 Ill. App.2d 291, (the then Third District) it was held that a motion to direct a verdict presents only a legal question and is subject to review without a motion for a new trial.

Summary of this case from Keen v. Davis
Case details for

Mann v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:Almon R. Mann, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. Zink Sanders, Defendant-Appellee

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District

Date published: Apr 6, 1961

Citations

29 Ill. App. 2d 291 (Ill. App. Ct. 1961)
173 N.E.2d 12

Citing Cases

Rzeszutko v. Yellin

"Collins argues that no question could be raised as to the time when their post-trial motion was filed since…

Knab v. Alden's Irving Park, Inc.

Brookhaven here argues that no relief should be granted to Collins since they filed their post-trial motion…