From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. Mann

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 1991
578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1113.

April 16, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Stuart M. Simons, J.

Bluestein Wayne, and Greene Marks, and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant.

Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum Zavertnik, and Paul Siegel, Miami, for appellee.

Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Joel B. Mann, appeals from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage. We affirm.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in the equitable distribution of the parties' assets. The record in the case contains conflicting evidence regarding the valuation of the assets. The trial court, having heard the evidence, is in a better position to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Accordingly, the trial court's findings are presumed correct. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629 (Fla. 1982); Storer v. Storer, 353 So.2d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1978); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1977); see also Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mann v. Mann

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 16, 1991
578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Mann v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:JOEL B. MANN, APPELLANT, v. SYLVIA (SALLIE) MANN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 16, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 395 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Suarez v. Suarez

The trial court properly valued the husband's insurance company and did not, as urged, fail to take into…

Straley v. Frank

If the new statute changes the Ball presumption, an affirmance is even more strongly indicated. Mann v. Mann,…