From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mann v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 5, 1972
192 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

47327.

ARGUED JULY 6, 1972.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1972.

Action for damages. Spalding Superior Court. Before Judge Whalen.

William R. Hurst, for appellant.

Beck, Goddard, Owen, Squires Murray, Samuel Murray, for appellees.


Plaintiff in a suit for invasion of privacy appeals from the summary judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff contends the tort committed was the sending of a letter to his employer by a creditor regarding a debt. This court has recently held that this conduct does not give rise to an action for invasion of privacy. Signal Oil c. Co. v. Conway, 126 Ga. App. 711. See also Gouldman-Taber Pontiac v. Zerbst, 213 Ga. 682 ( 100 S.E.2d 881) on which the holding in the Signal Oil case is based.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JULY 6, 1972 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1972.


Summaries of

Mann v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 5, 1972
192 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Mann v. King

Case Details

Full title:MANN v. KING et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 5, 1972

Citations

192 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
127 Ga. App. 39

Citing Cases

Zahner Manufacturing Co. v. Harnish

The court having failed to state its reason for granting a new trial, it may be assumed that it was on the…