Opinion
Argued October 5, 1896
Decided October 20, 1896
Edward C. James for appellants.
Treadwell Cleveland, for respondents.
Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.
All concur, except O'BRIEN, J., taking no part.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Manhattan Railway Company v. O'Sullivan
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1896
44 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1896)
Summaries of
Manhattan Railway Company v. O'Sullivan
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 20, 1896
44 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1896)
Case details for
Manhattan Railway Company v. O'Sullivan
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 20, 1896
Citations
44 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1896)
44 N.E. 1125
Citing Cases
Matter of Town of Guilford
The power of the court was deemed to be inherent to review, where a substantial right had been invaded,…