From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 9, 2011
75 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2D11–1751.

2011-12-9

Daniel MANDUJANO–JIMINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Karla F. Wright, Judge.PER CURIAM.

Daniel Mandujano–Jiminez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. See Barrios–Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios–Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

DAVIS, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 9, 2011
75 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Mandujano-Jiminez v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MANDUJANO-JIMINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

75 So. 3d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)