From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mancuso v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1996
226 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 30, 1996

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Christopher Mega, J.).


In an action seeking to recover for personal injuries sustained by claimant when, as a spectator at a basketball game played at a college campus owned by defendant, a fight broke out during the course of the game, issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment, including whether the fight was foreseeable; if so, whether defendant failed to provide adequate security to prevent it; and, if not, whether such breach of duty was a proximate cause of claimant's injury ( see, Rotz v. City of New York, 143 A.D.2d 301; Shtekla v. Topping, 23 A.D.2d 750, 751).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Mancuso v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1996
226 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Mancuso v. State

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK MANCUSO, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 320 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 225

Citing Cases

Vetrone v. Ha Di Corp.

The fact that the third person's acts may constitute criminal conduct does not necessarily make them a…

Radicevic v. Laguardia Assoc.

The fact that the third person's acts may constitute criminal conduct does not necessarily make them a…