Mancine v. State

Full title: Vincent MANCINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

95 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–274.

2012-08-8

Vincent MANCINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02–7914 CF10A. Vincent Mancine, Doral, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02–7914 CF10A.
Vincent Mancine, Doral, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he challenges the Department of Corrections' application of his court-ordered jail credit. Defendant should first exhaust his administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections. See Ward v. State, 974 So.2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). If he is not satisfied with the Department's ruling, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate court. See Robinson v. State, 818 So.2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.